PSIKOANALISIS SIGMUND FREUD DALAM ANIME ONE PIECE KARYA EIICHIRO ODA

Authors

  • Moch Mukhlas Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban
  • Sri Yanuarsih Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban
  • I Wayan Letreng Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36709/bastra.v10i4.1941

Keywords:

Keyword: Psychoanalytic theory; One Piece; Freud; personality structure; anime study

Abstract

This study investigates the internal psychological composition of key characters in the anime One Piece, focusing on the Skypiea arc, by employing Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory. Utilizing a qualitative descriptive method, the research centers on five major characters: Monkey D. Luffy, Enel, Nami, Sanji, and Gan Fall. These figures were chosen due to their significant influence on the plot and the evident psychological complexity they display throughout the storyline. The data were collected through non-intrusive observation of episodes 185 to 192, emphasizing character dialogue, behavior, and interactions that represent the Freudian personality structures of Id, Ego, and Superego. The analysis shows that Enel predominantly operates under the influence of the Id, marked by his selfish desires, aggressive tendencies, and disregard for ethical boundaries. On the other hand, Luffy and Usopp are characterized by their use of the Ego, navigating challenging situations with rational judgment and emotional control. Meanwhile, Nami and Gan Fall exemplify the Superego, guided by moral values, compassion, and a strong sense of duty. These portrayals underline the psychological depth embedded in the anime’s narrative. The research highlights the potential of anime as a medium for scholarly exploration, particularly within literary and psychological studies. It affirms that popular visual culture, such as One Piece, can reflect intricate human behavior and mental processes. Therefore, this study contributes to expanding the academic scope of literary psychology and invites further interdisciplinary investigation.

 

References

Assuyuthi, J. (2024). Cinta, Moralitas, dan Aktualisasi Diri: Analisis Psikologi Sastra dalam Novel Bidadari Bermata Bening Karya Haiburrahman El Shirazy. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 01(1).

Daulay, F. T., Waskita, A. J., & Kurniawan, E. D. (2024). Analisis Id, Ego, Dan Superego Pada Tokoh Kefiandira Dalam Novel Mitomania Sudut Pandang Karya Ari Keling. Jurnal Humaniora Teknologi, 10(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.34128/jht.v10i1.156

Gumawang, I., Desa, I., Merah, T., Madang, B., Kabupaten, R., Timur, O. K. U., & Email, P. S. (n.d.). IAI-IPMU Gumawang. Jl. Irigasi Desa Tanah Merah Kec. Belitang Madang Raya Kabupaten OKU Timur Provinsi Sumatera-Selatan Email : 65–80.

Nasution, L., Mawaddah, A., Yusuf Siregar, M., & Gapur, A. (2024). Analisis Perkembangan Cosplay Sebagai Budaya Pop Jepang Di Kota Medan. Journal Education and Development, 12(3), 329.

Rama Aditya, & Ulpah Nupusiah. (2023). Paradigma Psikoanalisis Dalam Perspektif Sigmund Freud. Journal Education and Government Wiyata, 1(3), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.71128/e-gov.v1i3.16

Savitri, & Subandiyah, H. (2025). Kajian Psikoanalisis Sigmund Freud Tokoh Utama Dalam Novel “ Guru Aini ” Andrea Hirata. Bapala, 12(2), 55–69. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bapala/article/view/67648

Serli Rosida, & Ahmad Ilzamul Hikam. (2025). Analisis Psikoanalisis Sastra Terhadap Trauma dan Ingatan Kolektif dalam Novel Laut Bercerita Karya Leila S. Chudori. Morfologi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra Dan Budaya, 3(4), 64–88. https://journal.aspirasi.or.id/index.php/morfologi/article/view/1880

Suwandhi, E. A., & Raharjo, R. (2024). Kepribadian Id Tokoh Utama Dalam Novel Namaku Alam Karya Leila S. Chudori. Bapala, 11(1), 311–323. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bapala/article/view/59899

Yola, S., Rahayu, S., & Riau, U. I. (2025). SAJAK. 4, 117–124.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-18

How to Cite

Mukhlas, M., Sri Yanuarsih, & I Wayan Letreng. (2025). PSIKOANALISIS SIGMUND FREUD DALAM ANIME ONE PIECE KARYA EIICHIRO ODA . Jurnal Bastra (Bahasa Dan Sastra), 10(4), 1667–1679. https://doi.org/10.36709/bastra.v10i4.1941