KEKUASAAN DAN KONFLIK IDEOLOGI DALAM FILM KUPU-KUPU KERTAS: ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36709/bastra.v11i1.2055Keywords:
Power, Ideology, Kupu-Kupu Kertas, Critical Discourse Analysis, Fairclough.Abstract
This study examines power and ideological conflict in the film Kupu-Kupu Kertas through the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach developed by Norman Fairclough. The film reflects the historical tension between the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) in 1965 in Banyuwangi, framed through a love story between two characters from opposing ideological backgrounds. Drawing on Foucault’s theory of power-knowledge relations and Gramsci’s concept of ideological hegemony, this research explores how power discourse is constructed through the film’s textual elements, discursive practices, and social context. The novelty of this study lies in its choice of a rarely examined object and its distinct historical-political focus, differing from previous studies that explored power issues within the contexts of family, gender, or political speeches. The findings are expected to enrich critical studies on the representation of ideology and power in texts as instruments of ideological domination that shape public perception and interpretation of history and socio-political realities.
References
Antonio Gramsci. (1971). Prison Notebooks. New York: Quintin Howare and GeofrreyNowell. 58-59.
Bangsa Elya, M. (2014). Analisis Wacana Kritis dalam Perspektik Norman Fairclough. KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, Vol8(1), 1-19.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. London dan New York: Longman.
Foucoult, M. (2002). Power/ Knowledge, Wacana Kuasa/Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: Bentang
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 (New York: Pantheon Books), hal. 98.
Foucault, M. (2000). The Subject and Power dalam Kate Nash (Ed.), Readings in Contemporary Political Sociology. London: Blackwell.
Jorgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Los Angeles.
Munfarida, E. (2014). Analisis wacana kritis dalam perspektif Norman Fairclough. Komunika, 8(1), 1-15.
Kaban, E. P. B., Ginting, I. I. B., Kiki, S., & Ningsih W. (2021). Analisis Gramatikal Pada Novel Dua Garis Biru Karya Lucia Priandarini. Asas: Jurnal Sastra, 10(1), 1–11.
Karyati Z, & Rahmawati. (2020). Kohesi Gramatikal Konjungsi dalam Novel Sang Pemimpin: Sebuah Analisis Wacana. JIWP: Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 6(3), 348–353.
Kusuma, A. P., & Sabardila. (2022). Analisis Kohesi Gramatikal dan Kohesi Leksikal dalam Novel Layangan Putus. SEBASA: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2), 374–388.
Lestari, R. F. (2019). Kohesi dan Kohesi Paragraf dalam Karangan Narasi Mahasiswa Teknik Angkatan 2017 Universitas PGRI Banyuwangi. KREDO: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra, 3(1), 73–82.
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2014). Stilistika. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Rohana, & Syamsuddin. (2015). Analisis Wacana. CV. Samudra Alif Mim.
Sumaryanto. (2019). Karya Sastra Bentuk Prosa. Mutiara Aksara.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. Dalam D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (hlm. 352–371). Oxford: Blackwell.
